[Previous] [Next]
§12A-3-305.
§12A-3-305.
DEFENSES AND CLAIMS IN RECOUPMENT
(a) Except as stated in subsection (b) of this section, the right to
enforce the obligation of a party to pay an instrument is subject to
the following:
(1) a defense of the obligor based on (i) infancy of the obligor to
the extent it is a defense to a simple contract, (ii) duress, lack of
legal capacity, or illegality of the transaction which, under other
law, nullifies the obligation of the obligor, (iii) fraud that induced
the obligor to sign the instrument with neither knowledge nor
reasonable opportunity to learn of its character or its essential
terms, or (iv) discharge of the obligor in insolvency proceedings;
(2) a defense of the obligor stated in another section of this article
or a defense of the obligor that would be available if the person
entitled to enforce the instrument were enforcing a right to payment
under a simple contract; and
(3) a claim in recoupment of the obligor against the original payee of
the instrument if the claim arose from the transaction that gave rise
to the instrument; but the claim of the obligor may be asserted
against a transferee of the instrument only to reduce the amount owing
on the instrument at the time the action is brought.
(b) The right of a holder in due course to enforce the obligation of a
party to pay the instrument is subject to defenses of the obligor
stated in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of this section, but is not
subject to defenses of the obligor stated in paragraph (2) of
subsection (a) of this section or claims in recoupment stated in
paragraph (3) of subsection (a) of this section against a person other
than the holder.
(c) Except as stated in subsection (d) of this section, in an action
to enforce the obligation of a party to pay the instrument, the
obligor may not assert against the person entitled to enforce the
instrument a defense, claim in recoupment, or claim to the instrument
(Section 3-306 of this title) of another person, but the other
person's claim to the instrument may be asserted by the obligor if the
other person is joined in the action and personally asserts the claim
against the person entitled to enforce the instrument. An obligor is
not obliged to pay the instrument if the person seeking enforcement of
the instrument does not have rights of a holder in due course and the
obligor proves that the instrument is a lost or stolen instrument.
(d) In an action to enforce the obligation of an accommodation party
to pay an instrument, the accommodation party may assert against the
person entitled to enforce the instrument any defense or claim in
recoupment under subsection (a) of this section that the accommodated
party could assert against the person entitled to enforce the
instrument, except the defenses of discharge in insolvency
proceedings, infancy, and lack of legal capacity.
[Previous] [Next]